Кто за главного? Свобода воли с точки зрения нейробиологии - Майкл Газзанига

Глава 6. Мы есть закон

1 Van В i ем a D. (1997, March 3) A murder in Florida revives an earlier horror and raises questions about the aftermath of punishment. Time. Cm.: http://time.com

2 Spake A. (1997, March 5) Newsreal: the return of Larry Single-ton. Salon. Cm.: http://salon.com

3 Puit G. (2002, January 6) 1978 Mutilation: family relieved by Singletons death. Review-Journal. См.: http://crimeshots.com/VincentNightmare.html

4 Taylor M. (2002, January 1) Lawrence Singleton, despised ra-pisty dies /He chopped off teenager's arms in 19/8. San Francisco Chronicle. Cm.: http://sfgate.com

5 Harrower J. (1998) Applying psychology to crime. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

6 Hackett R. (2003, January 30) A victim, a survivor; an artist. Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Cm.: http://seattlepi.com

7 Nisbett R. E. et al. (2001) Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review. 108 (2): 291-310.

8 Nisbett R. E. (2003) The geography of thought: how Asians and Westerners think differently and why (P 2-3,5). NY: Free Press.^[50]

9 Hedden T. et al. (2008) Cultural influences on neural substrates of attentional control. Psychological Science. 19 (1): 12-17.

10 Uskul A. K. et al. (2008) Ecocultural basis of cognition: farmers and fishermen are more holistic than herders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 105 (25): 8552-8556.

11 Кім H. S. et al. (2010) Culture, serotonin receptor polymorphism and locus of attention. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 5: 212-218.

12 Частная беседа.

13 United Kingdom House of Lords decisions (1843, May 26, June 19). Daniel M’Naghten’s case. Cm.: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/ UKHL/1843/J16.html

14 Weisberg D. S. etal. (2008) The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 20: 470-477.

15 Shariff A. F. et al. (2014) Free will and punishment: a mechanistic view of human nature reduces retribution. Psychological Science. 25 (8): 1563-1570.

16 The President’s council on bioethics (2004). An overview of the impact of neuroscience evidence in criminal law. Cm.: https:// bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcbe/background/neuroscience_ evidence.html

17 Sc alia A. (2002) Atkins v. Virginia (00-8452) 556 U.S. 504. Cm.: https://law.comell.edu/supct/html/00-8452.ZO.html

18 Snead О. C. (2006) Neuroimaging and the courts: standards and illustrative case index. Cm.: http://ncsc.org

19 Talairach P. T., Tournoux P. (1988) Co-planar stereotaxic atlas for the human brain. 3-D proportional system: an approach to cerebral imaging (P VII). NY: Thicme Medical Publishers.

20 Miller M. B. et al. (2002) Extensive individual differences in brain activations associated with episodic retrieval are reliable over time. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 14 (8): 1200-1214.

21 Doron C., Gazzaniga M.S. (2009) Neuroimaging techniques offer new perspectives on callosal transfer and interhemi-spheric communication. Cortex. 44 (8): 1023-1029.

22 Putman M.C. et al. (2009) Cortical projection topography of the human splenium: hemispheric asymmetry and individual difference. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 22 (8): 1662-1669.

23 Desmurget M. et al. (2009) Movement intention after parietal cortex stimulation in humans. Science. 324 (811): 811-813.

24 Brass M., Haggard P. (2008) The what, when, whether model of intentional action. Neuroscientist. 14 (4): 319-325.

25 Brass M., Haggard P. (2007) To do or not to do: the neural signature of self-control. Journal of Neuroscience. 27 (34): 9141-9145.

26 Kuhn S. et al. (2009) Intentional inhibition: how the “veto-area” exerts control. Human Brain Mapping. 30 (9): 2834-2843.

27 Schaukr F. (2010) Neuroscience, lie-detection, and the law: contrary to the prevailing view, the suitability of brain-based lie-detection for courtroom or forensic use should be determined according to legal and not scientific standards. Trends in Cognitive Science. 14 (3): 101-103.

28 Bond C.F., de Paulo B.M. (2006) Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 10: 214-234.

29 Meisser С. A., Bigham J. С. (2001) Thirty years of investigating the own race bias in memory for faces: a meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 7 (1): 3-35.

30 Connors E. etal. (1996) Convicted by juries, exonerated by science: case studies in the use of DNA evidence to establish innocence after trial. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

31 Turk D. J. et al. (2005) Can perceptual expertise account for the own-race bias in face recognition? A split-brain study. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 22 (7): 877-883.

32 Harris L. T., Fiske S.T. (2006) Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: neuroimaging responses to extreme out-groups. Psychological Science. 17 (10): 847-853.

33 Wilkinson R. A. (1997) A shifting paradigm: modern restorative justice principles have their roots in ancient cultures. Corrections Today. Cm.: http://drc.ohio.gov

34 Постерный доклад, представленный на конференции: Sloane S., Baillargeon R. (2010) 2.5-year-olds divide resources equally between two identical non-human agents. Annual meeting of the International Society of Infant Studies. Baltimore, MD.

35 Постерный доклад, представленный на конференции: Geraci A., Surian L. (2010) Sixteen-month-olds prefer agents that perform equal distributions. Annual meeting of the International Society of Infant Studies. Baltimore, MD.

36 Постерный доклад, представленный на конференции: Не Z., Baillargeon R. (2010) Reciprocity within but not across groups: 2.5-year-olds' expectations about ingroup and outgroup agents. Annual meeting of the International Society of Infant Studies. Baltimore, MD.

37 Постерный доклад, представленный на конференции: Vaish A. et al. (2010) Moral mediators of young children's prosocial behavior toward victims and perpetrators. Annual meeting of the International Society of Infant Studies. Baltimore, MD.

38 Harris P. L., Nunez M. (1996) Understanding permission rules by preschool children. Child Development. 67 (4): 1572-1591.